- Online Watchers: 10
Casio EX-FH20 digital camera: First Look Review
Video Details
Stuart Miles checks out Casio's new offering in the high speed digital camera market, the EX-FH20. With 40fps recording and a huge zoom does it do the business? More
Added Nov 6, 2008
Channel Tech
Duration 4:4 | views 49732
Local Comments 0
Youtube Comments 88
Rating:
Tags casio exfh20 ex-fh20 ex fh 20 camera digital compact fps slow motion so-mo high speed video pictures photo photos photograph photographs photographer picture snap record zoom analogue review overview preview opinion first look hands on megawhat tv
Permalink:
Categories
Twitter Feeds
Flickr
Post a comment
Local Comments (0)
Youtube Comments (88)
gumgl Says:
FYI the EX-FH20 takes better pictures than the EX-F1 (9MP vs. 6MP, 20X zoom vs. 12X) and it is almost 3 times cheaper ($350 vs. $1000) so yeah, the EX-F1 IS expensive.
Kylork Says:
I agree. If I made the camera I would have allowed it to shoot 1280x720 at 1000fps. But cameras like that cost upwards of $100,000. The EX-FH25 (which I own) is the the best bang for your buck. If you want better, then buy a used the EX-F1 which is overall, about twice as good, but cost about $1500 or so.
mariorenzi Says:
Very bad looking video, next time take a wider one please
Kylork Says:
Additional EX-FH20 info: Movie modes: 480x360 at 210 fps 224x168 at 420fps 224x56 at1000 fps 640x480 at 30 fps 1280x720 at 30fps
fatzy9ttuts Says:
U SOUND LIKE BEAR GRYLLS!!!!
BarbnGrill Says:
thanks for the notice
logitech4873 Says:
No problem. :)
shoesarecoole Says:
my bad i didnt read the date
logitech4873 Says:
This is why I hate getting my comments in the highest rated ones. People respond to them all the time, and says the exact same thing. Go look for one of my older responses if you really care.
shoesarecoole Says:
this camera is 200$ ex f1 is a 1000
krisscreates Says:
how do u make the screen in 6 squares like in 1:29
orlandarko Says:
u suck. sorry but is the worst review id ever seen
logitech4873 Says:
Nice setup :D But I do understand your problem. Point is, you don't buy this camera if you only want to take pictures, you buy this if you're going to use the High-speed capability.
elnicko123 Says:
yeh it doesn't effect most people but if i wanted to take a photo for my desktop, it would need to be scaled as i have a 3 monitor setup; 1280+1920+1280=4 480 wide. Meaning i would have to stretch the image more than double its size.
logitech4873 Says:
2816 x 2112 You know, this camera takes some great images, and that resolution doesn't limit it at all. Megapixels =/= Quality.
elnicko123 Says:
only 6MP though :(
logitech4873 Says:
Sorry, but I don't find that expensive at all. It sounds like you're comparing it to a normal compact digital camera.
hageman24 Says:
its like 1000 bucks dude. thats expensive.
SAYMYNAM386 Says:
You cant compare a Point and Shoot to a DSLR! For you to make that comment I think most would of thought it was in its price range. Obviously not.
logitech4873 Says:
I find that to be a pretty standard price for a good DSLR camera. :|
logitech4873 Says:
More like ">1000$". It was exactly 1000$ when I purchased it in Norway, and I can't imagine that it isn't cheaper in the US. And is 1000$ so damn much? It's what the PS3 was priced at launch here.
rideshorse05 Says:
I would LOVE the ex-f1, but it's just too expensive for me.
jamespk3run Says:
thanx for your help :)
logitech4873 Says:
Well, the camera in this video then. 350$
jamespk3run Says:
thanx, it does look very good, but is there anything thats a little more affordable?